Fit before access
Send a platform, target journey and existing backlog if one exists. You get a fit/no-fit answer and explicit exclusions before anyone touches code.
Founding wholesale pilot · €750
Findings are easy.Shipping the fixes is the work.
White-label accessibility remediation for e-commerce agencies. One critical customer journey, up to five root-cause code fixes, a manual retest and client-ready evidence—in five business days.
The gap
Another scan is not another solution.
Automated checks are useful for finding some issues. They do not establish complete coverage, and they do not repair the customer journey. The expensive part is still reproduction, source-code work, regression control and evidence.
W3C notes that passing automated ACT rules only means no matching failures were detected—not that all accessibility requirements were tested.
Fixed pilot
A small enough scope to ship. A real enough result to matter.
One storefront, one codebase and one representative path. Five means five shared root-cause patterns—not five isolated DOM warnings.
Founding wholesale€750€375 deposit · one feedback round
Included
- One agreed storefront journey
- Keyboard, focus, zoom, forms and screen-reader spot checks
- Up to five root-cause fixes in source or theme code
- Manual retest and before/after evidence
- Residual backlog and white-label handoff
Not included
- Legal opinion or compliance guarantee
- Full WCAG-EM audit or certificate
- Overlay or accessibility widget
- Platform core and third-party payment surfaces
- Unlimited pages, revisions or storefronts
How it runs
Your team keeps ownership. The sprint absorbs the specialist backlog.
Fix the root cause
We reproduce the issue, change the shared component or pattern, and tie every included finding to a commit or pull request.
Retest and hand back
The agreed journey is checked again. Your team receives concise before/after evidence, deployment notes and an honest residual backlog.
The handoff
Evidence another developer can actually use.
The output is not a glossy compliance score. It is a compact engineering record your team can review, deploy, roll back and pass to a client or independent auditor.
- Impact
- Keyboard focus is lost when the cart drawer opens.
- Root cause
- Shared drawer component does not set or restore focus.
- Change
- Focus entry, containment and return added at component level.
- Retest
- Passed on agreed journey
Questions worth asking
Sharp boundaries prevent expensive surprises.
Can our own developers do this?
Probably. The pilot makes sense when your team has a backlog, deadline or a temporary gap in specialist QA capacity. We do not sell basic HTML education.
Does this make a store “compliant”?
No. It repairs and retests a defined technical scope. Legal applicability, a full evaluation and certification sit outside the sprint.
What if the audit has more than five issues?
We agree the five highest-value root causes that fit the path and 12-hour cap. Everything else stays visible in the residual backlog with a proposed next step.
Will you deploy to production?
Only when access, staging, backup, approval and rollback are explicit. A pull request and evidence handoff is the safer default.
One useful next step
Send one store URL or an existing issue list.
We will return fit/no-fit, included root-cause patterns, access needed and exclusions before either side commits. No free scan, no fear pitch, no vague audit.
Reply with
- platform + theme/framework
- target customer journey
- existing backlog, if any
- source/deploy ownership
Founding pilot · €750 · 5 business days
Email one existing issue